by FCM » Sun Mar 04, 2018 7:52 pm
I got a different one a couple of days ago. There was a copyright mark on the photo, but it was a copyright just for the photo. The signature was done off of the photo. (Basically, it was on a long piece of photo paper with the photo taking up only part of the paper and signature under it.) The ink also bounces off the paper differently than the paper itself. It matches pictures of his autographs, but not too perfectly to mean it's an autopen.
So, that is super weird that I get an authentic (or very likely authentic) autograph and you get one that seems fake. That stinks! But, yes, for double measure, check with him on Twitter! I don't know if he tells if an autograph is authentic or not anymore, but, even if it's fake, it would be super cool to get a reply from him on Twitter!
I got a different one a couple of days ago. There was a copyright mark on the photo, but it was a copyright just for the photo. The signature was done off of the photo. (Basically, it was on a long piece of photo paper with the photo taking up only part of the paper and signature under it.) The ink also bounces off the paper differently than the paper itself. It matches pictures of his autographs, but not too perfectly to mean it's an autopen.
So, that is super weird that I get an authentic (or very likely authentic) autograph and you get one that seems fake. That stinks! But, yes, for double measure, check with him on Twitter! I don't know if he tells if an autograph is authentic or not anymore, but, even if it's fake, it would be super cool to get a reply from him on Twitter!