Did you actually read my post above comparing the handwriting on the stamp and the handwriting on the "signed" one?

Looking at the "signature" and the stamp side by side I do not believe that they were written by the same person.

I have no interest in finding out who signed the handwritten one, the key point is that as far as I can see it does not appear to have been Jerry Lee Lewis.

[quote="HappinessStan"]The point I was making is that the hand-signed ones are secretarial, dedication and signature. The pen running out is irrelevant.[/quote]

how do you know that??
they could be sec, but if so who signed them? they are send to his home adress (I did) if he have secreterial via his home adress, then he muts bee very rude to his wife and houseceapers

I mean he is 76 years old he knows how his signature look like, adn he proboaly sends out stamps now

The point I was making is that the hand-signed ones are secretarial, dedication and signature. The pen running out is irrelevant.

They were definitely stamped. The fact that the second picture isn't a full signature and the ink had run out from the first stamping proves that.

Wasn't even any need to debate cause of that. Nobody's pen or marker runs out of ink at only the top of their autograph. :lol:

Here is a clearer copy of the stamp from another example posted previously.

[attachment=0]jllstamp.jpg[/attachment]

The signed J has a round loop, while the stamped J goes to a point, the y at the end of Jerry on the stamp is stubby and almost square while the signed one is long and goes down to a very sharp point, much further than the stamp. The rest of the signed Jerry has way more strokes than the stamp. The start of the loop on the L on the Lee on the signed one starts a lot higher and further out from the loop than the stamp.

The Lewis on both are just completely different, on the signed one the letters are clear and distinct, while the stamped one looks like a race to the finish line, practically illegible. Finally, the stamp has a very deliberate underline, which isn't there on the signed one.

I'm not convinced.

If it heps, here is a close up of his handwrite.
It says: "to Ehud"

Yeah I agree yours would be authentic, and I did notice the dedications do resemble his handwriting a bit, not sure why he would use a stamp then?

[quote="HappinessStan"][quote="oldies"]I posted a success a few months ago - before the database was erassed.
http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/3669/jerryleelewis.jpg[/quote]

Since this thread is discussing authenticity, I hope you won't mind me making the observation that (as far as I can make out from the scan) the flow of the handwriting on yours looks more like the dedication on the originals posted by Foosarah04 than the stamped signature.[/quote]


His pen was running low on ink... :D
I agree, the hand writing on the dedication looks the same - so why did he use a stamp??
I'm sure my autograph is authentic, (I compared it to a few PSA/DNA authentic ones|).

[quote="oldies"]I posted a success a few months ago - before the database was erassed.
http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/3669/jerryleelewis.jpg[/quote]

Since this thread is discussing authenticity, I hope you won't mind me making the observation that (as far as I can make out from the scan) the flow of the handwriting on yours looks more like the dedication on the originals posted by Foosarah04 than the stamped signature.

I posted a success a few months ago - before the database was erassed.

http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/3669/jerryleelewis.jpg